Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Rigele Te vs Zhu Guo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Te vs Guo analysis and find out who is favored!
Rigele Te vs Zhu Guo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Te 0 - 0 Guo
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Te has won 50.34% of points on their second serve, while Guo has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Te, in recent form, has won 48.16% of their opponent's second serve points, while Guo has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.05% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Te has saved 60.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Guo has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Te has won 56.76% of matches played (W/L 21/ 16), with Guo winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Te has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 122/ 97), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3). Guo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Te has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.89% of matches (W/L 7/ 11), where as Guo has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Te has played against opponents with an average rank of 232.7 while Guo has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Te has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Guo has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Te has converted 56.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Guo has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
493
Rank
395
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
55% (169-137)
Career Total W/L
11% (1-8)
60% (9-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$980
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Rigele Te vs Zhu Guo For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Te VS Guo
Sportsbook
Offer
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Rigele Te | Zhu Guo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (20/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (180/159) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 100% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.65 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 108 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:11 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 368.93 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (581/1022) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (428/581) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (222/441) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (38/67) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (354/949) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (9/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Rigele Te Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats 
Rigele Te
Player
Ye Cong Mo
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
15
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rigele Te
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rigele Te
Player
Chase Ferguson
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
100%
(
24 of
24)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
79%
(
11 of
14)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
14 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rigele Te
Player
Qiulin Wang
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Rigele Te
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
81)
11
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
41 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rigele Te
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
59%
(
70 of
118)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
112)
13
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
39 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
112)
118
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(7) 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Rigele Te
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
12
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rigele Te
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
10
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
19 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Rigele Te
46%
(
27 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
8
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Zhu Guo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan-Samuel Weissborn
Player
Zhu Guo
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhuoyang Qiu
Player
Zhu Guo
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hufu Wang
Player
Zhu Guo
43%
(
16 of
37)
1st Serve %
34%
(
21 of
62)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Te Vs Guo Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Te are available here and Guo photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
